↓ Skip to main content

Decision Making, the P3, and the Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine System

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Bulletin, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
20 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1215 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Decision Making, the P3, and the Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine System
Published in
Psychological Bulletin, January 2005
DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Psychologists and neuroscientists have had a long-standing interest in the P3, a prominent component of the event-related brain potential. This review aims to integrate knowledge regarding the neural basis of the P3 and to elucidate its functional role in information processing. The authors review evidence suggesting that the P3 reflects phasic activity of the neuromodulatory locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system. They discuss the P3 literature in the light of empirical findings and a recent theory regarding the information-processing function of the LC-NE phasic response. The theoretical framework emerging from this research synthesis suggests that the P3 reflects the response of the LC-NE system to the outcome of internal decision-making processes and the consequent effects of noradrenergic potentiation of information processing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 24 2%
Italy 8 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
Other 17 1%
Unknown 1139 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 298 25%
Researcher 191 16%
Student > Master 154 13%
Student > Bachelor 92 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 7%
Other 199 16%
Unknown 202 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 482 40%
Neuroscience 163 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 5%
Engineering 26 2%
Other 118 10%
Unknown 272 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#9,316,584
of 31,990,159 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Bulletin
#1,463
of 2,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,167
of 198,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Bulletin
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,990,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.