↓ Skip to main content

Hydralazine-associated vasculitis: Overlapping features of drug-induced lupus and vasculitis

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hydralazine-associated vasculitis: Overlapping features of drug-induced lupus and vasculitis
Published in
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hydralazine is an antihypertensive medication that has been associated with drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DIL) as well as ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Although rare, early diagnosis is critical since drug cessation is the mainstay of therapy. This retrospective study aims to characterize the clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic features of this disease. Once approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Iowa, all patients carrying a diagnosis of vasculitis (ICD9 code: 447.6 or ICD10 code: I77.6, I80, L95, M30, or M31) and positive ANCA lab results over the past 15 years were identified. Age, gender, comorbid conditions, medications taken over the prior 6 months, laboratory data, including electrolytes, urine studies and serologies, chest x-rays, CT scans, and pathologic biopsy records were abstracted from the electronic medical record. 323 cases of AAV were identified, of which 12 were exposed to hydralazine, all at the time of diagnosis. The average duration of hydralazine therapy was 22 months and mean cumulative dose was 146g. Patients were typically older (70.3 years old) with slight female preponderance (7 females). Eleven patients presented with dyspnea, fatigue, and unintentional weight loss. Five had polyarthralgias and 8 had lower extremity petechiae. All 12 patients were both ANA and ANCA positive. ANA titers ranged from 1:160 and 1:2560. Ten were of diffuse pattern while 2 were nucleolar. ANCA titers ranged from 1:320 to 1:2560. Eleven had a pANCA pattern while one had cANCA. All 12 patients were positive for histone and 11 were positive for myeloperoxidase antibodies. Eleven also had dsDNA antibodies, and 4 had anti-cardiolipin IgG or IgM antibodies. Nine patients were also hypocomplementemic (mean C3 level: 88.4mg/dL; mean C4 level: 16.5mg/dL). All patients had variable levels of proteinuria (1+ to 3+) and eleven had active urine sediment. Urine protein:creatinine ratios ranged from 0.2 to 1.7. Of the 6 patients who underwent kidney biopsy, all 6 showed pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis. Seven patients had bilateral pulmonary interstitial infiltrates and four had pleural effusions on CT scan. Four had pericardial effusions as demonstrated by echocardiography. Hydralazine-associated vasculitis is a drug-associated autoimmune syndrome that presents with interstitial lung disease, hypocomplementemia, and pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. Patients have elements of both DIL and DIV, as manifested by high ANA and ANCA titers as well as the presence of histone and MPO antibodies. Further research is needed to understand the etiopathogenesis of this condition.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 33 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Design 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 34 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2026.
All research outputs
#2,216,317
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#186
of 2,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,583
of 497,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.