↓ Skip to main content

Interactive Effects of Personality and Perceptions of the Work Situation on Workplace Deviance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
562 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interactive Effects of Personality and Perceptions of the Work Situation on Workplace Deviance
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2004
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.599
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous research on workplace deviance has examined the relationship of either personality or employees' situational perceptions with deviant behavior. In this study, the authors focused on the joint relationship of personality and perceptions of the work situation with deviant behavior. Using 4 samples of employees and multiple operationalizations of the core constructs, the authors found support for the hypothesis that positive perceptions of the work situation are negatively related to workplace deviance. In addition, consistent with hypotheses, the personality traits of conscientiousness, emotional stability, and agreeableness moderated this relationship. Specifically, the relationship between perceptions of the developmental environment and organizational deviance was stronger for employees low in conscientiousness or emotional stability, and the relationship between perceived organizational support and interpersonal deviance was stronger for employees low in agreeableness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Malaysia 3 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 525 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 124 22%
Student > Master 74 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 47 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Student > Bachelor 38 7%
Other 112 20%
Unknown 125 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 204 36%
Psychology 135 24%
Social Sciences 40 7%
Arts and Humanities 12 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 2%
Other 23 4%
Unknown 137 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,343
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,633
of 143,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.