↓ Skip to main content

Building an Open Science Framework to Model Soil Organic Carbon

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Quality, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Building an Open Science Framework to Model Soil Organic Carbon
Published in
Journal of Environmental Quality, July 2018
DOI 10.2134/jeq2017.08.0318
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As funding agencies embrace open science principles that encourage sharing data and computer code developed to produce research outputs, we must respond with new modes of publication. Furthermore, as we address the expanding reproducibility crisis in the sciences, we must work to release research materials in ways that enable reproducibility-publishing data, computer code, and research products in addition to the traditional journal article. Toward addressing these needs, we present an example framework to model and map soil organic carbon (SOC) in the cereal grains production region of the northwestern United States. Primarily associated with soil organic matter, SOC relates to many soil properties that influence resiliency and soil health for agriculture. It is also critical for understanding soil-atmospheric C flux, a significant part of the overall C budget of the Earth. The technique for modeling soil properties uses seven categories of environmental input data to make predictions: known soil attributes, climatic values, organisms present, relief, parent material, age, and spatial location. We gather data representing these categories from various public sources. The map is produced using a random forest statistical model with inputs to predict SOC content on a 30-m spatial grid. All modeling components including input data, metadata, computer code, and output products are made freely available under an explicit open-source license. In this way, reproducibility is supported, the methods and code released are available to be reused by other researchers, and the research products are open to critical review and improvement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Librarian 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Computer Science 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#23,602,796
of 33,248,718 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#2,997
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,223
of 364,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#29
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,248,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.