↓ Skip to main content

Review: Placental derived biomarkers of pregnancy disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Placenta, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review: Placental derived biomarkers of pregnancy disorders
Published in
Placenta, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.placenta.2017.01.119
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pregnancy is one of the greatest physiological challenges that a women can experience. The physiological adaptations that accompany pregnancy may increase the risk of developing a number of disorders that can lead to both acute and chronic physiological outcomes. In addition, fetal development may be impaired and, if the fetus survives, the child may be at an increased risk of disease throughout life. Pregnancy disorders are poorly predicted by traditional risk factors and maternal history alone. The identification of biomarkers that can predict incidence and severity of disease would allow for improved and targeted prophylactic therapies to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Many of these pregnancy disorders, including preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm birth are known to be regulated at least in part by poor trophoblast invasion and/or dysregulated placental function. Cellular stress within the placenta increases the release of a number of factors into the maternal circulation. While many of these factors minimally impact maternal biology, others affect key physiological systems and contribute to disease. Importantly, these factors may be detected in physiological fluids and have predicative capacity making them ideal candidates as biomarkers of pregnancy disorders. This review will discuss what is known about these placental derived biomarkers of pregnancy disorders and highlight potential clinical opportunities for disease prediction and diagnosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 76 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Placenta
#459
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,127
of 422,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Placenta
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.