↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Transplantation and Informatics: Current Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stem Cell Transplantation and Informatics: Current Considerations
Published in
Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.792
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Informatics strategies and applications available to stem cell transplant (SCT) programs are diverse and changing rapidly. While most hospitals have electronic medical records (EMR), few are equipped with specialized SCT applications. Most EMR do not contain critical elements to support SCT practice and research. Strategies to optimize IT resources to support SCT programs are reviewed, and technical and workflow support are discussed. Guidance and rationale for the use of both SCT applications and EMR are emphasized.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,326,550
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
#2,706
of 3,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,252
of 495,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Blood & Marrow Transplantation
#57
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.