↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Missense Mutation in MVK Associated With MK Deficiency and Dyserythropoietic Anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Novel Missense Mutation in MVK Associated With MK Deficiency and Dyserythropoietic Anemia
Published in
Pediatrics, April 2010
DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-1774
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) is a rare inborn error of metabolism caused by mutations in the mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene. The clinical phenotype is variable, ranging from the hyperimmunoglobulinemia D and periodic fever syndrome (HIDS) to mevalonic aciduria (MA), a severe metabolic disease. We report here for the first time (to our knowledge) the case of a patient with MKD and congenital dyserythropoietic anemia. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of inflammatory attacks were compatible with HIDS, but mild dysmorphic features and elevated urinary mevalonic acid levels in the absence of an inflammatory attack suggested an intermediate phenotype between HIDS and MA. Genomic sequencing of the MVK gene revealed compound heterozygosity for a missense mutation previously described in MA (V310M) and a novel missense mutation (Y116H). By contrast, sequencing of the novel CDAII (SEC23B) gene revealed no mutations, suggesting that the bone marrow abnormalities were causally related to the MKD. Treatment with corticosteroids and colchicine directed at controlling the autoinflammatory disease resulted in improvement of the anemia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#9,994
of 16,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,733
of 95,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#81
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.