↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of interventions for co‐residing family caregivers of people with dementia: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of interventions for co‐residing family caregivers of people with dementia: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1111/1440-1630.12464
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Occupational therapists and health practitioners commonly provide interventions to family caregivers of people with dementia with the aim of relieving burden, depression, and disruptions in health and social support. To date, the effects of multicomponent interventions specifically targeting these four important outcomes has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions on four outcomes for co-residing family caregivers of people with dementia. A comprehensive database search of the literature was performed using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, OTseeker, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Randomised control trials (RCTs) that included multicomponent interventions for co-residing family caregivers addressing burden, depression, health and social support were selected. Relevant articles were critically reviewed and study results were synthesised. Meta-analysis was conducted separately. Twenty-two of 358 retrieved studies were selected, with 15 studies being included in the meta-analyses. The multicomponent interventions identified were comprised of a range of different individual strategies. Significant effective results were found for all four specified outcomes. Many types of multicomponent interventions appear beneficial on all of the four specified outcomes. The literature presents a trend that multicomponent interventions consisting of a combination of counselling, support groups, education, stress and mood management or telephone support are important strategies within an effective multicomponent intervention.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 194 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 73 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 18%
Psychology 24 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 80 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,268,959
of 31,763,039 outputs
Outputs from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#105
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,957
of 364,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,763,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.