↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of pharmacists' integration into patient-centered medical home teams

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceptions of pharmacists' integration into patient-centered medical home teams
Published in
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are a newer paradigm of health care service delivery. Team-based care that includes pharmacists has been implemented in several countries. Subsequently studies have successfully identified challenges and barriers with team-based care. Research on pharmacists' integration into PCMH is warranted to help bridge knowledge from earlier studies exploring team-based care. In 2010, the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) began a national PCMH implementation, operationalized as "Patient-Aligned Care Teams" (PACTs). The VA's national PACT implementation presents an opportunity to describe other persistent barriers to effective coordination between primary care and pharmacy providers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,896,100
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
#849
of 1,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,299
of 269,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.