↓ Skip to main content

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 1.2018.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 1.2018.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), March 2018
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard T Hoppe, Ranjana H Advani, Weiyun Z Ai, Richard F Ambinder, Patricia Aoun, Philippe Armand, Celeste M Bello, Cecil M Benitez, Philip J Bierman, Robert Chen, Bouthaina Dabaja, Robert Dean, Andres Forero, Leo I Gordon, Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Ephraim P Hochberg, Jiayi Huang, Patrick B Johnston, Mark S Kaminski, Vaishalee P Kenkre, Nadia Khan, Kami Maddocks, David G Maloney, Monika Metzger, Joseph O Moore, David Morgan, Craig H Moskowitz, Carolyn Mulroney, Rachel Rabinovitch, Stuart Seropian, Randa Tao, Jane N Winter, Joachim Yahalom, Jennifer L Burns, Ndiya Ogba

Abstract

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) provide recommendations for the management of adult patients with HL. The NCCN Guidelines Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within the NCCN Member Institutions, examine relevant data, and reevaluate and update the recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize recent updates centered on treatment considerations for relapsed/refractory classic HL.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 16 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,121,378
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#689
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,902
of 377,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.