↓ Skip to main content

Controlling the Elongation Phase of Transcription with P-TEFb

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
24 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
649 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Controlling the Elongation Phase of Transcription with P-TEFb
Published in
Molecular Cell, August 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) is a cyclin-dependent kinase that controls the elongation phase of transcription by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). This process is made possible by the reversal of effects of negative elongation factors that include NELF and DSIF. In complex organisms, elongation control is critical for the regulated expression of most genes. In those organisms, the function of P-TEFb is influenced negatively by HEXIM proteins and 7SK snRNA and positively by a variety of recruiting factors. Phylogenetic analyses of the components of the human elongation control machinery indicate that the number of mechanisms utilized to regulate P-TEFb function increased as organisms developed more complex developmental patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 626 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 27%
Researcher 96 15%
Student > Master 74 11%
Student > Bachelor 59 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 134 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 205 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 5%
Chemistry 17 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 2%
Other 31 5%
Unknown 143 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2026.
All research outputs
#3,462,715
of 31,943,232 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#3,088
of 8,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,156
of 118,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,943,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.