↓ Skip to main content

Reward Structure as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Extraversion and Sales Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, December 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reward Structure as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Extraversion and Sales Performance
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, December 1996
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.619
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The proposition that the relationship between extraversion and sales performance is moderated by reward structure was investigated. Specific hypotheses were tested with data obtained from 152 sales representatives. One group of sales representatives was rewarded primarily for obtaining new sales and another primarily for retaining customers. Data pooled across the 2 groups showed that extraversion did not correlate significantly with either new sales or customer retention. However, moderator analysis revealed that extraversion was positively associated with the dimension of performance that was explicitly rewarded but not with the nonrewarded dimension. A significant correlation between conscientiousness and new sales, but not between conscientiousness and customer retention, was found with the pooled data. As expected, relationships between conscientiousness and sales performance were not moderated by reward structure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 57 46%
Psychology 25 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 25 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#9,627,104
of 31,943,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,604
of 3,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,798
of 116,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,943,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.