↓ Skip to main content

Thermal Energy and the Origin of Life

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Thermal Energy and the Origin of Life
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11084-005-9003-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Life has evolved on Earth with electromagnetic radiation (light), fermentable organic molecules, and oxidizable chemicals as sources of energy. Biological use of thermal energy has not been observed although heat, and the thermal gradients required to convert it into free energy, are ubiquitous and were even more abundant at the time of the origin of life on Earth. Nevertheless, Earth-organisms sense thermal energy, and in suitable environments may have gained the capability to use it as energy source. It has been proposed that the first organisms obtained their energy by a first protein named pF(1) that worked on a thermal variation of the binding change mechanism of today's ATP sythase enzyme. Organisms using thermosynthesis may still live where light or chemical energy sources are not available. Possible suitable examples are subsurface environments on Earth and in the outer Solar System, in particular the subsurface oceans of the icy satellites of Jupiter and Saturn.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Professor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Chemistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#5,574,997
of 32,842,765 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#84
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,996
of 117,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,842,765 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them