You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Winter feeding of elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and its effects on disease dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2017.0093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gavin G. Cotterill, Paul C. Cross, Eric K. Cole, Rebecca K. Fuda, Jared D. Rogerson, Brandon M. Scurlock, Johan T. du Toit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 25% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,753,637
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,647
of 7,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,397
of 354,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#78
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.