↓ Skip to main content

Geometric and Electronic Structures of Boron(III)‐Cored Dyes Tailored by Incorporation of Heteroatoms into Ligands

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - An Asian Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Geometric and Electronic Structures of Boron(III)‐Cored Dyes Tailored by Incorporation of Heteroatoms into Ligands
Published in
Chemistry - An Asian Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/asia.201403272
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Complexation of a boron atom with a series of bidentate heterocyclic ligands successfully gives rise to corresponding BF2 -chelated heteroarenes, which could be considered as novel boron(III)-cored dyes. These dye molecules exhibit planar structures and expanded π-conjugated backbones due to the locked conformation with a boron center. The geometric and electronic structures of these BF2 complexes can be tailored by embedding heteroatoms in the unique modes to form positional isomer and isoelectronic structures. The structure-property relationship is further elucidated by studying the photophysical properties, electrochemical behavior and quantum-chemical calculations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 71%
Materials Science 2 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2025.
All research outputs
#7,261,930
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#518
of 7,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,729
of 410,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - An Asian Journal
#9
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.