↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prolonged Exposure of CBA/Ca Mice to Moderately Loud Noise Can Cause Cochlear Synaptopathy but Not Tinnitus or Hyperacusis as Assessed With the Acoustic Startle Reflex
Published in
Trends in Hearing, March 2018
DOI 10.1177/2331216518758109
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hearing loss changes the auditory brain, sometimes maladaptively. When deprived of cochlear input, central auditory neurons become more active spontaneously and begin to respond more strongly and synchronously to better preserved sound frequencies. This spontaneous and sound-evoked central hyperactivity has been postulated to trigger tinnitus and hyperacusis, respectively. Localized hyperactivity has also been observed after long-term exposure to noise levels that do not damage the cochlea. Adult animals exposed to bands of nondamaging noise exhibited suppressed spontaneous and sound-evoked activity in the area of primary auditory cortex (A1) stimulated by the exposure band but had increased spontaneous and evoked activity in neighboring A1 areas. We hypothesized that the cortically suppressed frequencies should for some time after exposure be perceived as less loud than before (hypoacusis), whereas the hyperactivity outside of the exposure band might lead to frequency-specific hyperacusis or tinnitus. To investigate this, adult CBA/Ca mice were exposed for >2 months to 8 to 16 kHz noise at 70 or 75 dB sound pressure level and tested for hypo-/hyperacusis and tinnitus using tone and gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex. Auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions showed evidence of cochlear synaptopathy after exposure at 75 but not 70 dB, putting a lower bound on damaging noise levels for CBA/Ca mice. Contrary to hypothesis, neither exposure significantly shifted startle results from baseline. These negative findings nevertheless have implications for startle test methodology and for the putative role of central hyperactivity in hyperacusis and tinnitus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#20,282,011
of 32,106,825 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Hearing
#171
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,420
of 367,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Hearing
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,106,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.