Association of Paternal Age and Risk for Major Congenital Anomalies From the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2004

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Epidemiology, January 2010

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source
twitter: 2 X users

wikipedia: 1 Wikipedia page
reddit: 2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley: 113 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 2 X posts from 2 X users, with an upper bound of 386 followers.

@_mickydicky Yes: https://t.co/YtJguAxouW https://t.co/5FFkhfdJPY https://t.co/xwZ4h6QHWg These are just 3 of endless studies on this. If you're interested in reading more, checking out the introduction to the 3rd in the list here will yield a lo…

@noradrenalinegf @AdamUncle76 @hollowearthterf Relative vs absolute risk is the point. If your risk is 1 in 1250 at 25 and 1 in 100 at 40, you should have kids younger. It's not rocket science. Studies in men are all over the place. For example, less …

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity.