↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A role for fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosome 22q dosage in distinguishing atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors from medulloblastoma/central primitive neuroectodermal tumors
Published in
Human Pathology, February 2001
DOI 10.1053/hupa.2001.21572
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It has been postulated that infants with medulloblastomas/central primitive neuroectodermal tumors (MB/PNET) may fare worse than older patients because some of them harbor unrecognized atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT), rare intracranial neoplasms that are typically unresponsive to therapy and rapidly fatal. Although small primitive cells are common to both entities, chromosome 22q11.2 deletions are common only in AT/RTs. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on archival, paraffin-embedded biopsy tissue with commercially available probes to 22q11.2, the region associated with RTs, we studied 8 cases of AT/RT, 12 cases of MB/PNET, and 4 cases of primitive central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms, which were difficult to classify. 22q Deletions were identified in 6 of 8 (75%) conventional AT/RTs and 0 of 12 (0%) children with classic MB/PNET. Of the 4 originally "difficult to classify" cases, 3 had deletions of 22q. In light of the FISH results, review of the morphology and immunophenotype resulted in 3 tumors being reclassified as AT/RTs and 1 as a large cell MB. These 4 cases highlight the potential diagnostic use of FISH for selected cases of primitive CNS malignancies in children and substantiate the notion that misdiagnosed AT/RTs may, in part account for the worse prognosis associated with "MB/PNET" in children younger than 2 years of age.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2008.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#1,498
of 3,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,917
of 123,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.