↓ Skip to main content

Global Variation in Use of Enteral Nutrition for Pediatric Crohn Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Global Variation in Use of Enteral Nutrition for Pediatric Crohn Disease
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, August 2018
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001946
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an effective induction treatment for pediatric Crohn disease. Given the center-based variation in use and diversity in practice we constructed a survey aimed at sharing experience and strategies in administering EEN, stimulating further research, and optimizing therapy. This survey was constructed after consultation with experts and designed to address key knowledge gaps. The survey was disseminated through the Paediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN, Canadian Children IBD Network, selective experts, and was sent twice through the PEDGI-BB. Data were collected into REDCap and analyzed using descriptive statistics. In total, 146 participants from 26 countries completed the survey. Sixty-five percent of participants were general, non-IBD-focused pediatric gastroenterologists, 21% were IBD-focused, and 10% were dietitians. The most common indications (∼90% use) were for ileocecal and ileocolonic disease (Paris L1 and L3). The most common duration was 8 weeks and 66% preferred oral to nasogastric administration. Most (63%) did not allow any additional intake and 69% instructed patients to continue partial EN after completing treatment. Dietitians were identified as essential to EEN success while the primary challenges of EEN programs were adherence and lack of support. Regional and professional practice differences were observed in EEN indication, age, exclusivity, program structure/support, and cost coverage. We found significant variation in practice and use of EEN with several regional and professional differences. Global variation offers opportunities for research and improving care. This survey establishes a framework and provides resources for collaboration and information sharing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,304,886
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#704
of 7,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,740
of 373,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#10
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.