↓ Skip to main content

Prolonged QT interval and risk of sudden death in South-East Asian men

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prolonged QT interval and risk of sudden death in South-East Asian men
Published in
The Lancet, August 1991
DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90419-p
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sudden death in sleep occurs in substantial numbers among young men in South-East Asia. The frequencies of electrocardiographic abnormalities were measured in groups with varying risks of such sudden death. The mean heart-rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) was significantly (p less than 0.05) greater among 123 Laotian refugees in Thailand at high risk (405 [95% confidence interval 397-413] ms) than in 77 Laotian refugees in the United States at lower risk (364 [359-369] ms) and 199 non-Asian US residents at negligible risk (358 [354-362] ms). Among refugees in Thailand, prolonged QTc interval was associated with poor thiamine status and a history of seizure-like episodes in sleep. Thiamine deficiency may be a cause of prolonged QT interval and sudden death in this region.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,745,521
of 28,766,646 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#26,534
of 47,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,679
of 19,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#55
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,766,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.