↓ Skip to main content

Republished: Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: a realist review

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medical Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Republished: Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: a realist review
Published in
Postgraduate Medical Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-002846rep
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quality improvement (QI) is a common competency that must be taught in all physician training programmes, yet, there is no clear best approach to teach this content in clinical settings. We conducted a realist systematic review of the existing literature in QI curricula within the clinical setting, highlighting examples of trainees learning QI by doing QI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Qatar 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 23 28%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 43%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#2,466
of 3,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,842
of 360,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medical Journal
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.