↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Exon 1 Cys7Gly Polymorphism Within the Betacellulin Gene Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes in African Americans
Published in
Diabetes, April 2005
DOI 10.2337/diabetes.54.4.1179
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In vitro and in vivo studies suggest a role for betacellulin in islet neogenesis and regeneration. Since abnormalities in beta-cell function play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes, a mutation in the betacellulin gene could potentially contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes. Using RT-PCR, we initially determined that betacellulin was expressed in 9- to 24-week-old human fetal pancreas. We then screened the betacellulin gene for mutations in subjects with type 2 diabetes and identified seven polymorphisms in segments encompassing the 5' untranslated region (G-233C, A-226G), exon 1 (TGC19GGC, Cys7Gly), exon 2 (CTC130TTC, Leu44Phe), exon 4 (TTG370ATG, Leu124Met), intron 2 (T-31C), and intron 4 (C-4T). These polymorphisms were genotyped in an expanded set of diabetic case and control subjects. Among African Americans (n = 334), the frequency of the Gly7 allele in exon 1 was 31.9% in diabetic case subjects compared with 45.1% in nondiabetic control subjects (P = 0.0004). Allele frequencies for the other polymorphisms did not differ significantly between African-American case and control subjects. Additionally, there were no significant differences in allele frequencies between case and control subjects among the Caucasian sample (n = 426) for any of the seven polymorphisms, including the Gly7 variant. Further studies will be needed to understand the different roles that betacellulin polymorphisms play in susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in Caucasians and African Americans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#4,049
of 9,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,892
of 59,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#32
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.