↓ Skip to main content

Open resection and laryngotracheal reconstruction in a case of subglottic hemangioma in PHACE syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Open resection and laryngotracheal reconstruction in a case of subglottic hemangioma in PHACE syndrome
Published in
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a 1 month old infant with PHACE syndrome who underwent successful management of subglottic hemangioma by open resection and laryngotracheal reconstruction using a thyroid ala graft. Propranolol is typically the treatment of choice for subglottic hemangiomas however, recent reports have suggested adverse complications with the use of propranolol in children with PHACE syndrome. The child had cerebral and cervical vascular anomalies associated with her PHACE syndrome making her at an increased risk of stroke with the use of propranolol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,442,202
of 27,999,580 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#1,563
of 3,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,196
of 353,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
#24
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,999,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,836 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.