↓ Skip to main content

A core SMRT corepressor complex containing HDAC3 and TBL1, a WD40-repeat protein linked to deafness

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
36 patents
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A core SMRT corepressor complex containing HDAC3 and TBL1, a WD40-repeat protein linked to deafness
Published in
Genes & Development, May 2000
DOI 10.1101/gad.14.9.1048
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The corepressor SMRT mediates repression by thyroid hormone receptor (TR) as well as other nuclear hormone receptors and transcription factors. Here we report the isolation of a novel SMRT-containing complex from HeLa cells. This complex contains transducin beta-like protein 1 (TBL1), whose gene is mutated in human sensorineural deafness. It also contains HDAC3, a histone deacetylase not previously thought to interact with SMRT. TBL1 displays structural and functional similarities to Tup1 and Groucho corepressors, sharing their ability to interact with histone H3. In vivo, TBL1 is bridged to HDAC3 through SMRT and can potentiate repression by TR. Intriguingly, loss-of-function TRbeta mutations cause deafness in mice and humans. These results define a new TR corepressor complex with a physical link to histone structure and a potential biological link to deafness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Chemistry 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,670,510
of 33,666,858 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#976
of 6,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,437
of 57,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,666,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.