↓ Skip to main content

Mutation analysis of NR2E3 and NRL genes in Enhanced S Cone Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutation analysis of NR2E3 and NRL genes in Enhanced S Cone Syndrome
Published in
Human Mutation, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/humu.9285
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ten new and seventeen previously reported Enhanced S Cone Syndrome (ESCS) subjects were used to search for genetic heterogeneity. All subjects were diagnosed with ESCS on the basis of clinical, psychophysical and/or electroretinography testing using published criteria. Mutation analysis was performed on the NR2E3 nuclear receptor gene by single strand conformation analysis and direct sequencing, which revealed either homozygous (N=13) or compound heterozygous (N=11) mutations in 24 subjects (89%), heterozygous mutations in 2 subjects (7%) and no mutations in 1 subject (4%). Fifteen different mutations were identified, including six not previously reported. The subject (Patient A) with no detected NR2E3 mutation had features not usually associated with ESCS, in particular moderate rod photoreceptor function in peripheral retina and an abnormally thick retinal nerve fibre layer. Mutation analysis of the NRL, CRX, NR1D1 and THRB genes in this individual revealed a heterozygous one base-pair insertion in exon 2 of the NRL gene, which results in a predicted truncation of the NRL protein. Loss-of-function NRL alleles have not been described previously in humans, but since the same mutation was present in unaffected family members, it raises the possibility that the abnormal ESCS phenotype in Patient A may result from a digenic mechanism, with a heterozygous NRL mutation and a mutation in another unknown gene.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
South Africa 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
China 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2026.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#984
of 2,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,442
of 133,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#22
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.