↓ Skip to main content

A silent polymorphism in the PER1 gene associates with extreme diurnal preference in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Genetics, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A silent polymorphism in the PER1 gene associates with extreme diurnal preference in humans
Published in
Journal of Human Genetics, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10038-006-0060-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The three PERIOD proteins form a major negative feedback component of the molecular mechanism governing the periodicity of the vertebrate circadian clock. Genetic variations within the human PER2 and PER3 genes have been linked with diurnal preference and disorders of sleep timing. We screened the coding region of PER1, as well as the 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions and the promoter region, for polymorphisms. The T2434C polymorphism in exon 18, a synonymous substitution, associated with extreme diurnal preference. The C allele was more frequent in subjects with extreme morning preference (frequency=0.24) than in subjects with extreme evening preference (frequency=0.12). No significant association was observed between either allele and delayed sleep phase syndrome. This polymorphism may have a direct effect on RNA translatability, or be in linkage disequilibrium with another polymorphism which affects PER1 expression at the DNA, RNA, or protein level. This is the first reported association between a PER1 polymorphism and extreme diurnal preference. Functionally important polymorphisms in PER1 are rare, which may indicate that it is subject to more stringent selection pressure than the other PER genes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Croatia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Researcher 25 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 14%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Genetics
#751
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,059
of 87,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Genetics
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.