↓ Skip to main content

Two Critical Hits for Promyelocytic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Two Critical Hits for Promyelocytic Leukemia
Published in
Molecular Cell, November 2000
DOI 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00111-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is associated with chromosomal translocations that always involve the RARalpha gene, which variably fuses to one of several distinct loci, including PML or PLZF (X genes). Due to the reciprocity of the translocation, X-RARalpha and RARalpha-X fusion proteins coexist in APL blasts. PLZF-RARalpha transgenic mice (TM) develop leukemia that lacks the differentiation block at the promyelocytic stage that characterizes APL. We generated TM expressing RARalpha-PLZF and PLZF-RARalpha in their promyelocytes. RARalpha-PLZF TM do not develop leukemia. However, PLZF-RARalpha/RARalpha-PLZF double TM develop leukemia with classic APL features. We demonstrate that RARalpha-PLZF can interfere with PLZF transcriptional repression and that this is critical for APL pathogenesis, since leukemias in PLZF(-/-)/PLZF-RARalpha mutants and in PLZF-RARalpha/RARalpha-PLZF TM are indistinguishable. Thus, both products of a cancer-associated translocation are crucial in determining the distinctive features of the disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,515,649
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#5,711
of 8,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,591
of 46,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.