↓ Skip to main content

Effect of elevated CO2 and small boat noise on the kinematics of predator–prey interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of elevated CO2 and small boat noise on the kinematics of predator–prey interactions
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2018
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2017.2650
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Oceans of the future are predicted to be more acidic and noisier, particularly along the productive coastal fringe. This study examined the independent and combined effects of short-term exposure to elevated CO2and boat noise on the predator-prey interactions of a pair of common coral reef fishes (Pomacentrus wardiand its predator,Pseudochromis fuscus). Successful capture of prey by predators was the same regardless of whether the pairs had been exposed to ambient control conditions, the addition of either playback of boat noise, elevated CO2(925 µatm) or both stressors simultaneously. The kinematics of the interaction were the same for all stressor combinations and differed from the controls. The effects of CO2or boat noise were the same, suggesting that their effects were substitutive in this situation. Prey reduced their perception of threat under both stressors individually and when combined, and this coincided with reduced predator attack distances and attack speeds. The lack of an additive or multiplicative effect when both stressors co-occurred was notable given the different mechanisms involved in sensory disruptions and highlights the importance of determining the combined effects of key drivers to aid in predicting community dynamics under future environmental scenarios.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 33%
Environmental Science 13 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,588,807
of 32,886,880 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,243
of 12,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,215
of 366,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#54
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,886,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.