↓ Skip to main content

A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychological Measurement, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 586)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Continuous a-Stratification Index for Item Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing
Published in
Applied Psychological Measurement, March 2018
DOI 10.1177/0146621618758289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Huebner, Chun Wang, Bridget Daly, Colleen Pinkelman

Abstract

The method of a -stratification aims to reduce item overexposure in computerized adaptive testing, as items that are administered at very high rates may threaten the validity of test scores. In existing methods of a -stratification, the item bank is partitioned into a fixed number of nonoverlapping strata according to the items' a , or discrimination, parameters. This article introduces a continuous a -stratification index which incorporates exposure control into the item selection index itself and thus eliminates the need for fixed discrete strata. The new continuous a -stratification index is compared with existing stratification methods via simulation studies in terms of ability estimation bias, mean squared error, and control of item exposure rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Linguistics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2026.
All research outputs
#3,110,120
of 33,660,302 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychological Measurement
#7
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,598
of 373,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychological Measurement
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,660,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.