↓ Skip to main content

XAS Investigation of the Structure and Function of Ni in Acireductone Dioxygenase †

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
XAS Investigation of the Structure and Function of Ni in Acireductone Dioxygenase †
Published in
Biochemistry, May 2002
DOI 10.1021/bi012209a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acireductone dioxygenases (ARDs) are enzymes involved in the methionine recycle pathway, which regulates aspects of the cell cycle. Klebsiella pneumoniae produces two enzymes that share a common polypeptide sequence and differ only in the metal ion present. Reaction of acireductone (1,2-dihydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentene) with Fe-ARD and dioxygen produces formate and 2-keto-4-methylthiobutanoic acid, the alpha-ketoacid precursor of methionine. Ni-ARD reacts with acireductone and dioxygen to produce methylthiopropionate, CO, and formate and does not lie on the methionine recycle pathway. An X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) study of the structure of the catalytic Ni center in resting Ni-ARD enzyme and the enzyme-substrate complex is reported. This study establishes the structure of the Ni site in resting Ni-ARD as containing a six coordinate Ni site composed of O/N-donor ligands including 3-4 histidine residues, demonstrates that the substrate binds to the Ni center in a bidentate fashion by displacing two ligands, at least one of which is a histidine ligand, and provides insight into the mechanism of catalysis employed by a Ni-containing dioxygenase. Efficiently relaxed and hyperfine-shifted resonances are observed in the (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of Ni-ARD that can be attributed to the His imidazoles ligating the paramagnetic Ni ion and are consistent with the XAS results regarding His ligation. These resonances show significant perturbation in the presence of substrate, confirming that the metal ion interacts directly with the substrate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,266
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,637
of 124,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#2,709
of 8,389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.