↓ Skip to main content

Nedd4 and Nedd4-2: closely related ubiquitin-protein ligases with distinct physiological functions

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Differentiation, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nedd4 and Nedd4-2: closely related ubiquitin-protein ligases with distinct physiological functions
Published in
Cell Death & Differentiation, June 2009
DOI 10.1038/cdd.2009.84
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Nedd4 (neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated gene 4) family of ubiquitin ligases (E3s) is characterized by a distinct modular domain architecture, with each member consisting of a C2 domain, 2-4 WW domains, and a HECT-type ligase domain. Of the nine mammalian members of this family, Nedd4 and its close relative, Nedd4-2, represent the ancestral ligases with strong similarity to the yeast, Rsp5. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rsp5 has a key role in regulating the trafficking, sorting, and degradation of a large number of proteins in multiple cellular compartments. However, in mammals the Nedd4 family members, including Nedd4 and Nedd4-2, appear to have distinct functions, thereby suggesting that these E3s target specific proteins for ubiquitylation. In this article we focus on the biology and emerging functions of Nedd4 and Nedd4-2, and review recent in vivo studies on these E3s.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Luxembourg 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 29%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Master 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,396,431
of 29,420,386 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#843
of 3,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,250
of 140,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,420,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.