↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Activation and Induction of Antigen-Specific T Follicular Helper Cells Play a Critical Role in Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine-Induced Human Mucosal Anti-influenza Antibody Response
Published in
Journal of Virology, May 2018
DOI 10.1128/jvi.00114-18
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is increasing interest recently in developing intranasal vaccines against respiratory tract infections. Antibody response is critical in vaccine-induced protection and TFHis considered important in mediating antibody response. Most data supporting the role for TFHin antibody response are from animal studies, and direct evidence from humans is limited, apart from TFH-like cells in blood. We studied activation and induction of TFHand its role on anti-influenza antibody response by live-attenuated influenza vaccine(LAIV) in human nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue(NALT). TFHactivation in adenotonsillar tissues were analysed by flow-cytometry, and anti-hemagglutinin(HA) antibodies examined following LAIV stimulation of tonsillar mononuclear cells(MNC). Induction of antigen-specific TFHby LAIV was studied by flow-cytometry for induced TFHand CD154 expression. LAIV induced TFHproliferation which correlated with anti-HA antibody production, and TFHwas shown critical for antibody response. Induction of TFHfrom naïve T cells by LAIV was shown in newly induced TFHexpressing BCL6 and CD21, which was followed by the detection of anti-HA antibodies. Antigen specificity of LAIV-induced TFHwas demonstrated by the expression of antigen-specific T cell activation marker CD154 upon challenge by H1N1 virus antigen or HA. LAIV-induced TFHdifferentiation was inhibited by BCL6, IL21, ICOS and CD40 signalling blocking respectively, and that diminished anti-HA antibody production. We demonstrate for the first time the induction of antigen-specific TFHby LAIV in human NALT that provide critical support for anti-influenza antibody response. Promoting antigen-specific TFHin NALT by intranasal vaccines may provide an effective vaccination strategy against respiratory infections in humans.IMPORTANCE.Airway infection such as influenza is common in humans. Intranasal vaccination has been considered a more biologically relevant and effective way of immunization against airway infection. Vaccine-induced antibody response is crucial for protection against infection. Recent data from animal studies suggest one type of T cells, named TFHis important for the antibody response. However, data on whether this TFH-mediated help for antibody production operates in humans is limited, due to the lack of access to human immune tissue containing the TFHIn this study, we demonstrated the induction of TFHcells by an intranasal influenza vaccine in human immune tissue that provide critical support for anti-influenza antibody response. Our findings provide direct evidence that TFHcells play a critical role in vaccine-induced immunity in humans, and suggest a novel strategy to promote such cells by intranasal vaccines against respiratory infections.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 17 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#22,057
of 25,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,085
of 340,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#86
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.