↓ Skip to main content

Relationships Among Apathy, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Function in Huntington’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationships Among Apathy, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Function in Huntington’s Disease
Published in
Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, March 2018
DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17080173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora E. Fritz, Nicholas R. Boileau, Julie C. Stout, Rebecca Ready, Joel S. Perlmutter, Jane S. Paulsen, Kimberly Quaid, Stacey Barton, Michael K. McCormack, Susan L. Perlman, Noelle E. Carlozzi, Noelle Carlozzi, Praveen Dayalu, Anna L. Kratz, Stephen Schilling, Amy Austin, Matthew Canter, Siera Goodnight, Jennifer Miner, Nicholas Migliore, Ann Arbor, Jane S. Paulsen, Nancy Downing, Isabella DeSoriano, Courtney Hobart, Amanda Miller, Iowa City, Kimberly Quaid, Melissa Wesson, Christopher Ross, Gregory Churchill, Mary Jane Ong, Susan Perlman, Brian Clemente, Aaron Fisher, Gloria Obialisi, Michael Rosco, Los Angeles, Michael McCormack, Humberto Marin, Allison Dicke, Judy Rokeach, Joel S. Perlmutter, Stacey Barton, Shineeka Smith, Martha Nance, Pat Ede, Stephen Rao, Anwar Ahmed, Michael Lengen, Lyla Mourany, Christine Reece, Michael Geschwind, Joseph Winer, San Francisco, David Cella, Richard Gershon, Elizabeth Hahn, Jin-Shei Lai

Abstract

Up to 90% of individuals with Huntington's disease (HD)-a progressive, inherited neurodegenerative disorder-experience apathy. Apathy is particularly debilitating because it is marked by a reduction in goal-directed behaviors, including self-care, social interactions, and mobility. The objective of this study was to examine relationships between variables of apathy, functional status, physical function, cognitive function, behavioral status/emotional function, and health-related quality of life. Clinician-rated measures of physical, cognitive, and behavioral function, including one clinician-rated item on apathy, and self-reported measures of physical function, health-related quality of life, and emotional, cognitive, and social function were collected in a single session from 487 persons with the HD mutation (prodromal, N=193; early-stage manifest, N=186; late-stage manifest, N=108). Multiple linear regression models were used to examine which outcomes best predicted clinician-rated apathy after controlling for disease stage. Greater apathy related to less independence, increased motor impairment, and more clinician-rated behavioral problems (i.e., anger, irritability, depression). Similarly, poorer self-reported health-related quality of life; greater chorea; greater upper- and lower-extremity dysfunction; greater speech and swallowing dysfunction; worse anxiety, depression, and behavioral dyscontrol; worse cognitive function; and less satisfaction with social roles related to greater apathy. In conclusion, apathy related to physical, cognitive, and behavioral dysfunction across disease stages. Future work should explore whether clinical interventions targeting different functional domains may have the potential to reduce apathy in this patient population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Student > Master 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 76 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 85 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#11,392,599
of 34,758,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#674
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,751
of 377,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,758,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.