↓ Skip to main content

Idiosyncratic Ocular Symptoms Associated with the Estradiol Transdermal Estrogen Replacement Patch System

Overview of attention for article published in Optometry and Vision Science, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Idiosyncratic Ocular Symptoms Associated with the Estradiol Transdermal Estrogen Replacement Patch System
Published in
Optometry and Vision Science, January 1995
DOI 10.1097/00006324-199501000-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Estradiol Transdermal Estrogen Replacement Patch System (Estraderm) is designed to provide continuous estrogen replacement therapy through a rate-limiting membrane applied to the skin. The relative advantage of the patch over the more commonly prescribed oral medication, Premarin, is that the drug is absorbed directly into the bloodstream without extended metabolism by the digestive system and the liver. Ocular side effects associated with Estraderm, reported in the literature, include fluctuation in corneal curvature and variations of keratitis sicca. Here, a case is presented in which a 50-year-old Caucasian female, without previous ocular sequelae status after hysterectomy and oophorectomy, experienced what appears to be atypical ocular symptoms associated with the Estraderm. To the best of our knowledge, this information has not been reported in the literature. Clinicians should be aware of the unusual symptoms that could accompany the use of the Estradiol Estrogen Replacement Patch and include them among the differential diagnoses. The condition, its associated symptoms, and summary of the literature are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#10,917,355
of 31,959,560 outputs
Outputs from Optometry and Vision Science
#763
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,692
of 103,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Optometry and Vision Science
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,959,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.