↓ Skip to main content

Sensorimotor and Physiological Indicators of Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sensorimotor and Physiological Indicators of Impairment in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, March 2018
DOI 10.1177/1545968318760728
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To systematically review the literature with meta-analysis to determine whether persistence of sensorimotor or physiological impairment exists between 4 weeks to 6 months post mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and assign level of evidence to findings. The databases PubMed, pscyINFO, SPORTdiscus, Medline, CINAHL and Embase were searched from inception to November 2016 using a priori inclusion criteria. Critical appraisal was performed, and an evidence matrix established level of evidence. Meta-analysis of pooled results identified standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) between mTBI and healthy controls for a variety of physiological and sensorimotor indicators. Eighteen eligible articles, with a mean quality score of 15.67 (SD = 2.33) were included in the final review. Meta-analysis of center of motion variable; maximal mediolateral center of motion/center of pressure separation distance SMD [95% CI] approached significance at (-0.42 [-0.84, -0.00], I2= 0%) for dual task, level walking indicating a potential reduction in maximal mediolateral excursion during gait in the mTBI group compared to healthy controls. Significantly reduced variability in the standard deviation of heart beat intervals was observed in the mTBI group (-0.51 [-0.74, -0.28], I2= 0%). Overall, significant group differences in 36 sensorimotor and physiological variables (eg, balance, gait velocity and motion analysis outcomes, various oculomotor tasks, as well as heart rate variability frequency domains) were identified. Findings demonstrate that persistence of sensorimotor and physiological changes beyond expected recovery times following subacute mTBI in an adult population is possible. These findings have implications for post-injury assessment and management.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 45 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 49 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,362,233
of 31,660,612 outputs
Outputs from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#106
of 1,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,505
of 363,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,660,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.