↓ Skip to main content

Cloning and expression of the beta- and gamma-subunits of the human epithelial sodium channel

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cloning and expression of the beta- and gamma-subunits of the human epithelial sodium channel
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, May 1995
DOI 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.268.5.c1157
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels are an important component of the Na+ reabsorption pathway in a number of epithelia. Here we report the cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding two subunits of the human kidney epithelial Na+ channel (beta- and gamma-hENaC). Their predicted amino acid sequences were highly homologous (83-85% identical) to the corresponding subunits reported from rat colon (beta- and gamma-rENaC). Both beta- and gamma-hENaC mapped to human chromosome 16. Northern blot analysis showed high expression of beta- and gamma-hENaC in kidney and lung and differential expression of the three subunits in other tissues. Coexpression of beta- and gamma-hENaC with alpha-hENaC in Xenopus oocytes produced Na+ channels with high selectivity for Na+ and high sensitivity to amiloride. In addition, human subunits were able to substitute for the corresponding rat subunits in forming functional Na+ channels, suggesting conservation of function and suggesting that differences in sequence do not disrupt interactions between subunits. These results suggest that human alpha-, beta-, and gamma-ENaC together form Na+ channels with properties that are similar to those observed in epithelia, and will allow further investigation into the role that these channels may play in human disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Chemistry 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,394,515
of 33,992,632 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#811
of 4,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,899
of 34,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,992,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.