↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cloning, Chromosomal Localization, and Physical Linkage of the β and γ Subunits (SCNN1B and SCNN1G) of the Human Epithelial Amiloride-Sensitive Sodium Channel
Published in
Genomics, August 1995
DOI 10.1006/geno.1995.1188
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three subunits of the amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel, named alpha, beta, and gamma, have previously been cloned in rat colon. The human lung alpha chain (SCNN1A) has also been cloned and its gene localized on chromosome 12p13. We now report the molecular cloning of the human lung beta (SCNN1B) and gamma (SCNN1G) chains. In situ hybridization and pulsed-field electrophoresis experiments demonstrate that both genes are located within a common 400-kb fragment on chromosome 16p12-p13. Screening of the cDNA library reveals two forms of the beta subunit that differ by the presence or absence of a 464-bp fragment in the 3' region. A frameshift in the short form modifies the COOH terminal sequence of the corresponding protein. Since several similar frameshifts mutations have recently been reported in patients affected by a rare form of hypertension, the existence of COOH truncated forms of the beta chain might be of physiological importance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Master 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,473,978
of 29,658,575 outputs
Outputs from Genomics
#332
of 6,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,347
of 27,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genomics
#11
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,658,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.