↓ Skip to main content

Ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2 binds to and downregulates the epithelial Na+ channel

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2 binds to and downregulates the epithelial Na+ channel
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology, September 2002
DOI 10.1152/ajprenal.00080.2002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J. McDonald, Andrea H. Western, John D. McNeil, Brittany C. Thomas, Diane R. Olson, Peter M. Snyder

Abstract

The epithelial Na(+) channel (ENaC) is a critical component of the pathway maintaining salt and water balance. The channel is regulated by members of the Nedd4 family of ubiquitin-protein ligases, which bind to channel subunits and catalyze channel internalization and degradation. ENaC mutations that abolish this interaction cause Liddle's syndrome, a genetic form of hypertension. Here, we test the hypothesis that WW domain-containing protein 2 (WWP2), a member of the Nedd4 family of ubiquitin-protein ligases, is a candidate to regulate ENaC. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that WWP2 is expressed in epithelial tissues that express ENaC, as well as in a wide variety of other tissues. WWP2 contains four WW domains, three of which bound differentially to ENaC subunits. In contrast, all four human Nedd4-2 WW domains bound to ENaC. WWP2 inhibited ENaC when coexpressed in epithelia, requiring a direct interaction between the proteins; mutation of the ENaC PY motifs abolished inhibition. Thus expression, binding, and functional data all suggest that WWP2 is a candidate to regulate ENaC-mediated Na(+) transport in epithelia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Professor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,372,536
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology
#1,577
of 4,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,041
of 73,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Renal Physiology
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.