↓ Skip to main content

5′ Heterogeneity in epithelial sodium channel α-subunit mRNA leads to distinct NH2-terminal variant proteins

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
5′ Heterogeneity in epithelial sodium channel α-subunit mRNA leads to distinct NH2-terminal variant proteins
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, May 1998
DOI 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.5.c1312
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) is composed of three subunits: alpha, beta, and gamma. The human alpha-ENaC subunit is expressed as at least two transcripts (N. Voilley, E. Lingueglia, G. Champigny, M. G. Mattei, R. Waldmann, M. Lazdunski, and P. Barbry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 247-251, 1994). To determine the origin of these transcripts, we characterized the 5' end of the alpha-ENaC gene. Four transcripts that differ at their first exon were identified. Exon 1A splices to exon 2 to form the 5' end of alpha-ENaC1, whereas exon 1B arises separately and continues into exon 2 to form alpha-ENaC2. Other variant mRNAs, alpha-ENaC3 and alpha-ENaC4, are formed by activating 5' splice sites within exon 1B. Although alpha-ENaC3 and -4 did not change the open reading frame for alpha-ENaC, alpha-ENaC2 contains upstream ATGs that add 59 amino acids to the previous (alpha-ENaC1) protein. To address the significance of these isoforms, both proteins were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The cRNA for each alpha-ENaC transcript when combined with beta- and gamma-ENaC cRNA reconstituted a low-conductance ion channel with amiloride-sensitive currents of similar characteristics. We have thus identified variant alpha-ENaC mRNAs that lead to functional ENaC peptides.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,347,312
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#1,758
of 4,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,010
of 49,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.