↓ Skip to main content

Cloning, expression, and tissue distribution of a human amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular & Molecular Physiology, June 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cloning, expression, and tissue distribution of a human amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular & Molecular Physiology, June 1994
DOI 10.1152/ajplung.1994.266.6.l728
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels control, in part, fluid and electrolyte transport across epithelia in many organs. In the lung, they control the quantity and composition of the respiratory tract fluid and play a key role in the transition from a fluid-filled lung at the time of birth. Their function may also be altered in a number of diseases. The recent identification of an epithelial Na+ channel from rat colon allowed us to use a probe from that sequence to clone an amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel from human kidney, alpha hENaC. The cDNA had an open reading frame of 2,007 nucleotides and encoded a protein predicted to contain 669 amino acids. The amino acid sequence of alpha hENaC was 83% identical to that of the rat. The gene was mapped to chromosome 12 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of somatic cell hybrids. Transcripts of alpha hENaC were detected in human kidney, lung, liver, and pancreas. No message was detected in first- and second-trimester human fetal lung, indicating that alpha hENaC expression is developmentally regulated. In vitro transcription and translation of alpha hENaC produced a 74-kDa protein and translation in the presence of microsomal membranes produced a glycosylated 87-kDa protein. Expression of alpha hENaC in Xenopus oocytes produced currents that were amiloride sensitive and Na+ selective, properties consistent with the function of epithelial Na+ channels in native tissues.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,094,224
of 33,992,632 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular & Molecular Physiology
#1,635
of 3,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,275
of 31,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular & Molecular Physiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,992,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.