↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification of domains within the ϵ-subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF2B that are necessary for guanine nucleotide exchange activity and eIF2B holoprotein formation
Published in
BBA - Gene Structure & Expression, June 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00062-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor, eIF2B, is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) composed of five dissimilar subunits. eIF2B is important for regenerating GTP-bound eIF2 during the initiation process. This event is obligatory for eIF2 to bind initiator methionyl-tRNA, forming the ternary initiation complex. In the current investigation, deletion mutants of the catalytic subunit, eIF2B epsilon, were constructed to identify regions that are necessary for eIF2B catalytic activity and formation of the holoprotein. We used the baculovirus expression system to coexpress wild-type and truncated forms of the epsilon-subunit of mammalian eIF2B (eIF2B epsilon) with the other four subunits (alpha, beta, gamma, delta) of the protein in Sf9 cells. Removal of either the N- or the C-terminal conserved domains of eIF2B epsilon resulted in a significant loss of GEF activity and reduced or abolished interaction with the alpha-, gamma- and delta-subunits of eIF2B. Removal of the C-terminal 552 amino acids of eIF2B epsilon markedly reduced its interaction with the beta-subunit of eIF2 whereas loss of the N-terminal 431 amino acids did not. The results suggest that intact eIF2B epsilon is required for full catalytic activity and formation of the eIF2B holoprotein. In contrast, the C-terminal domain of eIF2B epsilon is sufficient alone for binding the beta-subunit of its substrate, eIF2, in vitro.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 47%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from BBA - Gene Structure & Expression
#745
of 1,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,449
of 58,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BBA - Gene Structure & Expression
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.