↓ Skip to main content

TFIIH is negatively regulated by cdk8-containing mediator complexes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TFIIH is negatively regulated by cdk8-containing mediator complexes
Published in
Nature, September 2000
DOI 10.1038/35024111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 27%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Chemistry 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2025.
All research outputs
#3,483,351
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#56,067
of 111,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,882
of 51,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#101
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 98.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.