↓ Skip to main content

A protein phosphatase functions to recycle RNA polymerase II

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A protein phosphatase functions to recycle RNA polymerase II
Published in
Genes & Development, June 1999
DOI 10.1101/gad.13.12.1540
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transcription is regulated by the state of phosphorylation of a heptapeptide repeat known as the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) present in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). RNAPII that associates with transcription initiation complexes contains an unphosphorylated CTD, whereas the elongating polymerase has a phosphorylated CTD. Transcription factor IIH has a kinase activity specific for the CTD that is stimulated by the formation of a transcription initiation complex. Here, we report the isolation of a cDNA clone encoding a 150-kD polypeptide, which, together with RNAPII, reconstitutes a highly specific CTD phosphatase activity. Functional analysis demonstrates that the CTD phosphatase allows recycling of RNAPII. The phosphatase dephosphorylates the CTD allowing efficient incorporation of RNAPII into transcription initiation complexes, which results in increased transcription. The CTD phosphatase was found to be active in ternary elongation complexes. Moreover, the phosphatase stimulates elongation by RNAPII; however, this function is independent of its catalytic activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#3,301
of 5,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,468
of 35,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.