↓ Skip to main content

Functional Expression of IL-9 Receptor by Human Neutrophils from Asthmatic Donors: Role in IL-8 Release

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Expression of IL-9 Receptor by Human Neutrophils from Asthmatic Donors: Role in IL-8 Release
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, February 2001
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2768
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) express surface receptors for various inflammatory mediators, including IgE and IL-4. Recently, the IL-9R locus has been genetically linked to asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in humans. In this study, we evaluated expression of the IL-9R and the effect of IL-9 on human PMNs. RT-PCR analysis showed the presence of IL-9Ralpha-chain mRNA in PMN RNA preparations from asthmatic patients. Using FACS analysis, surface expression of IL-9Ralpha was detected on PMNs freshly isolated from asthmatics, and to a lesser extent on normal controls. In addition, protein expression of IL-9Ralpha was also detected in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage PMNs. Furthermore, functional studies showed that IL-9 stimulation of PMNs results in the release of IL-8 in a concentration-dependent manner. The anti-IL-9 neutralizing Ab suppressed this effect, but had no effect on GM-CSF-induced IL-8 release from PMNs. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel role for PMNs in allergic disease through the expression and activation of the IL-9R.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#3,474,989
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#1,752
of 33,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,575
of 161,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#15
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.