↓ Skip to main content

Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms and their role in muscle physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Microscopy Research and Technique, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms and their role in muscle physiology
Published in
Microscopy Research and Technique, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/1097-0029(20000915)50:6<532::aid-jemt10>3.0.co;2-e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Unlike vertebrate skeletal muscle, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms are encoded by a single gene. Alternative splicing of the primary transcript from a single gene generates four smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms. These isoforms differ both at the carboxyl terminus (SM1 and SM2 isoforms) and at the amino terminus (SM-A and SM-B isoforms). The smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoforms are differentially expressed during smooth muscle development and in different smooth muscle cell types. The mechanical properties of smooth muscle may be correlated with the myosin heavy chain content/isoform expression. However, the precise function of each smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoform to muscle contraction remains to be determined. This review mainly focuses on the molecular basis of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain isoform diversity, its expression during development and disease, and its role in muscle physiology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Iceland 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Engineering 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2007.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Microscopy Research and Technique
#193
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,271
of 107,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microscopy Research and Technique
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.