↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic Organization and Isoform-Specific Tissue Expression of Human NAPOR (CUGBP2) as a Candidate Gene for Familial Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia
Published in
Genomics, June 2001
DOI 10.1006/geno.2001.6558
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Neuroblastoma apoptosis-related RNA-binding protein (NAPOR; HGMW-approved symbol CUGBP2) is a newly discovered gene prominently induced during apoptosis, suggesting that it plays a role during apoptosis. We have found that it is encoded by a gene located on chromosome 10p13-p14 between Généthon markers D10S547 and D10S223, a region to which we have recently localized a gene responsible for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD). To examine its possible role in the pathogenesis of ARVD, we determined the genomic organization of the human NAPOR gene including its exon-intron boundaries and the putative promoter sequence, which provide a plausible mechanism for its alternative mRNA splicing. We also demonstrated that three isoforms of the NAPOR transcript were differently expressed, with NAPOR-3 being nearly neuron specific while the other two forms were ubiquitously expressed. The expression of NAPOR is differentially regulated during development. Finally, we screened the members of the ARVD family for mutations and identified two DNA sequence variants in the protein-coding exons of NAPOR, neither of which was responsible for ARVD. While the function of NAPOR remains to be elucidated, our current characterization of the NAPOR gene will be valuable for further clinical and functional study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Genomics
#2,169
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,961
of 47,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genomics
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.