↓ Skip to main content

hAG-2, the Human Homologue of theXenopus laevisCement Gland Gene XAG-2, Is Coexpressed with Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, October 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
hAG-2, the Human Homologue of theXenopus laevisCement Gland Gene XAG-2, Is Coexpressed with Estrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, October 1998
DOI 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9440
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

hAG-2, the human homologue of the Xenopus laevis cement gland gene Xenopus Anterior Gradient-2 (XAG-2), has been found to be coexpressed with estrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer cell lines by using suppression subtractive hybridization. Sequence analysis of clones obtained from a human breast adenocarcinoma MCF7 cDNA library suggests that at least three mRNA transcripts, differing in their 3'-untranslated regions, are transcribed from the hAG-2 gene. Northern blot analyses identified two principal hAG-2 signals in all ER-positive breast carcinoma cell lines that were absent in cell lines not expressing, or minimally expressing, ER. Coexpression of hAG-2 with ER suggests that hAG-2 may be involved in the tumor biology specific to the well-differentiated phenotype of hormonally-responsive breast cancers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 29%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Professor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2026.
All research outputs
#3,024,632
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#651
of 33,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,241
of 47,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#2
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.