Lack of sleep has a considerable impact on vigilance: we perform worse, we make more errors, particularly at night, when we should be sleeping. Measures of brain functional connectivity suggest that decrease in vigilance during sleep loss is associated with an impaired cross-talk within the fronto-parietal cortex. However, fronto-parietal effective connectivity, which is more closely related to the causal cross-talk between brain regions, remains unexplored during prolonged wakefulness. In addition, no study has simultaneously investigated brain effective connectivity and wake-related changes in vigilance, preventing the concurrent incorporation of the two aspects. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to record responses evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) applied over the frontal lobe in 23 healthy young men (18-30 yr.), while they simultaneously performed a vigilance task, during 8 sessions spread over 29 h of sustained wakefulness. We assessed Response Scattering (ReSc), an estimate of effective connectivity, as the propagation of TMS-evoked EEG responses over the fronto-parietal cortex. Results disclose a significant change in fronto-parietal ReSc with time spent awake. When focusing on the night-time period, when one should be sleeping, participants with lower fronto-parietal ReSc performed worse on the vigilance task. Conversely, no association was detected during the well-rested, daytime period. Night-time fronto-parietal ReSc also correlated with objective EEG measures of sleepiness and alertness. These changes were not accompanied by variations in fronto-parietal response complexity. These results suggest that decreased brain response propagation within the fronto-parietal cortex is associated to increased vigilance failure during night-time prolonged wakefulness. This study reveals a novel facet of the detrimental effect on brain function of extended night-time waking hours, which is increasingly common in our societies.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,097,241
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#8,509
of 12,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,954
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#169
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
