Chronic low-back pain (LBP) is a frequent cause of work absence and disability, and is frequently associated with long-term use of opioids.
To describe military readiness-related outcomes at follow-up in soldiers with LBP grouped by the type of early treatment received for their LBP. Treatment groups were based on receipt of opioid or tramadol prescription and receipt of nonpharmacologic treatment modalities (NPT). Design, Subjects, Measures: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of U.S. soldiers with new LBP episodes persisting more than 90 days between October 2012 and September 2014. Early treatment groups were constructed based on utilization of services within 30 days of the first LBP claim. Outcomes were measured 91-365 days after the first LBP claim. Outcomes were constructed to measure five indicators of limitations of military readiness: military duty limitations, pain-related hospitalization, emergency room visit for LBP, pain score of moderate/severe, and prescription for opioid/tramadol.
Among soldiers with no opioid receipt in the prior 90 days, there were 30,612 new episodes of LBP, which persisted more than 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression models found that compared to the reference group (no NPT, no opioids/tramadol receipt), soldiers who received early NPT-only had lower likelihoods for military duty limitations, pain-related hospitalization, and opioid/tramadol prescription at follow-up, while soldiers' that started with opioid receipt (at alone or follow-up in conjunction with NPT) exhibited higher likelihoods on many of these negative outcomes.
This observational study of soldiers with a new episode of LBP and no opioid receipt in the prior 90 days suggests that early receipt of NPT may be associated with small, significant gains in ability to function as a soldier and reduced reliance on opioid/tramadol medication. While further research is warranted, increased access to NPT at the beginning of LBP episodes should be considered.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,326,550
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#1,739
of 2,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,669
of 372,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
