↓ Skip to main content

TAB2 and TAB3 Activate the NF-κB Pathway through Binding to Polyubiquitin Chains

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TAB2 and TAB3 Activate the NF-κB Pathway through Binding to Polyubiquitin Chains
Published in
Molecular Cell, August 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The activation of NF-kappaB and IKK requires an upstream kinase complex consisting of TAK1 and adaptor proteins such as TAB1, TAB2, or TAB3. TAK1 is in turn activated by TRAF6, a RING domain ubiquitin ligase that facilitates the synthesis of lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Here we present evidence that TAB2 and TAB3 are receptors that bind preferentially to lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains through a highly conserved zinc finger (ZnF) domain. Mutations of the ZnF domain abolish the ability of TAB2 and TAB3 to bind polyubiquitin chains, as well as their ability to activate TAK1 and IKK. Significantly, replacement of the ZnF domain with a heterologous ubiquitin binding domain restored the ability of TAB2 and TAB3 to activate TAK1 and IKK. We also show that TAB2 binds to polyubiquitinated RIP following TNFalpha stimulation. These results indicate that polyubiquitin binding domains represent a new class of signaling domains that regulate protein kinase activity through a nonproteolytic mechanism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 368 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 31%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Master 40 11%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 77 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 6%
Chemistry 13 3%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 81 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2026.
All research outputs
#4,948,636
of 33,493,714 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#3,969
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,665
of 84,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#8
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,493,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.